River View Golf Course tee times

What golfers love

Golfers tell us that the course layout at this golf course is truly amazing. With big elevation changes and blind shots into higher greens, players find the experience to be both challenging and exciting. The putting area is also highly praised, with a beautifully maintained 18-hole putting course. Despite some issues with pace of play, golfers appreciate the enjoyable layout and the opportunity to test their skills on this course. Additionally, even on a light rainy day, the course is in great shape, exceeding expectations. However, it is worth noting that recent flooding has forced the staff to shorten the course to 9 holes, which may impact the overall experience. Golfers also express frustration with the lack of proper communication regarding course closures, which can lead to disappointment for those who have made prior bookings. Nevertheless, many golfers still find the course to be a good value for the money, considering the quality of the facility and the enjoyable playing experience. Overall, despite some minor drawbacks, this golf course offers a layout that golfers truly appreciate, making it a destination worth revisiting.

Good to know

Golfers tell us that the course layout could use some improvement. They mentioned that the 100 yard par 3's lack yardage readings, causing confusion for players. Additionally, there were discrepancies between the scorecard and the actual holes or yardages, which added to the frustration. Another area that needs attention is the pace of play. According to the reviews, golfers experienced significant backups and delays, especially on hole 4. This was mainly due to large groups being allowed to play ahead of others without enough space to play slower, forcing players to rush their shots. Course conditions were also a concern for some golfers. Approximately 30% of the course was flooded due to the Santa Ana River, while other areas were washed out from rain. This created unfavorable playing conditions that affected the overall experience. Reviewers also mentioned that the facility quality was lacking. Some described it as poor or average, indicating areas that could be improved to enhance the overall appeal of the golf course. Furthermore, staff quality and friendliness received mixed reviews. While some golfers reported positive interactions, others reported poor experiences with the staff. Despite the negatives, golfers did appreciate the course layout, which received positive feedback. They particularly enjoyed the big elevation changes and blind shots into higher greens. The putting area and the availability of a separate 18-hole putting course were also well-liked by the reviewers. However, the common theme throughout the reviews was the poor value for money. Many golfers felt that the $25 price tag was not justified by the overall experience they had. In conclusion, based on the reviews, the golf course would benefit from improvements in course layout, pace of play, course conditions, facility quality, and staff quality.